Global Green ConsultsKnowledge centre
← Back to the libraryKnowledge centre

Editorial & review policy

How we prepare materials, identify sources and distinguish learning from professional services.

This is the company's applied knowledge library. We disclose preparation methods and evidence limits; we do not describe materials as peer-reviewed or certified without a documented process.

01

Traceable technical sources

We link standards and guidance to their original organisations and identify editions, years and access dates where available. Confirm the applicable edition for a specific project.

02

Transparent preparation and review

We distinguish preparers from technical reviewers. A person is not named as a reviewer, and a technical-review date is not added, until a review has been performed and documented.

03

Educational examples and real outcomes

Hypothetical calculations are identified as teaching examples. They are not attributed to clients or completed projects. Project data require appropriate permission before publication.

04

Responsible AI assistance

Tools can support drafting, organisation and translation. Outputs require technical checking; predictions are not automatically measurements or verified results.

05

Traceable updates and corrections

We distinguish editorial updates from technical reviews and provide a suggested review date. Report an error with the material title and supporting source.

06

Service and certification boundaries

Reading a guide or requesting a consultation does not issue a certificate or carbon credit. Professional scope and independent validation, verification or approval requirements are agreed separately for the project.

Suggest a correction ↗
Editorial & review policyGlobal Green Consults · globalgreenconsults.com